Clang ALHP Repo(s)?

Neko-san commented

2021-12-10 04:11:44 +01:00

Would work be considered for a Clang branch of the ALHP repos?

Gontier-Julien commented

2021-12-10 11:02:20 +01:00

Not saying that this wouldn't be possible, but i think it would be a hell of a work to make the packages build with clang/llvm for lto, this require to modify each pkgbuild.
Even tho it could be automated, it @anonfunc that need to see this

Not saying that this wouldn't be possible, but i think it would be a hell of a work to make the packages build with clang/llvm for lto, this require to modify each pkgbuild. Even tho it could be automated, it @anonfunc that need to see this

titaniumtown commented

2021-12-10 13:51:02 +01:00

This would be awesome to see!

anonfunc added the

enhancement

label 2021-12-13 09:54:13 +01:00

Lehner82 commented

2021-12-31 02:04:14 +01:00

Clang can only be used if you set gcc as fallback. I would be suyprised if more than 25% of all arch packages fully compile with clang. I would personally only look into it once the main compiler chain has been completly finalized. And even then it's debatable.

👍 1

RubenKelevra commented

2022-05-05 19:06:25 +02:00

Contributor

Kind of similar to #92 which asks for Polly which would also require LLVM/Clang.

Clang ALHP Repo(s)? #75