Maybe don't rebuild kernel modules ? #23
Labels
No Label
blocked upstream
bug
build-failure
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
informational
invalid
invalid/corrupt package
packaging issue
priority: high
question
support
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: ALHP/ALHP.GO#23
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
I was thinking since the repo don't rebuild the kernel, maybe it shouldn't rebuild the kernel modules as well?
Even tho it don't seems to be an issue doing so, i don't think there will be a performance gain, and it may help with stability even if it stable, and may introduce some unintentional bugs.
How would you go about it? Manually blacklist them? Haskell packages were really easy to exclude, since they share a very specific makedep (ghc). Don't know if that applies to modules as well, since -headers alone seems too broad.
I thnk that this will need to be done manually :/
I think there is a spcecific makepkg for each one
Since they're don't seem to be an issue that the kernel modules is build in ALHP, and that the repo is more and more robust, I think we can close this issue?
I agree. Maybe there are no benefits, but excluding them would add more complexity.
As soon as there are (general) problems we need to reevaluate this.