vivaldi in its current form does not make sense to be in the ALHP repo #226

New Issue

Closed

opened 2023-12-23 18:31:17 +01:00 by BS86 · 2 comments

BS86 commented

2023-12-23 18:31:17 +01:00

The Arch PKGBUILD just repackages an RPM without actually building anything:
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/vivaldi/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads

source=("https://downloads.vivaldi.com/stable/vivaldi-stable-${_rpmversion}.x86_64.rpm"

The Arch PKGBUILD just repackages an RPM without actually building anything: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/vivaldi/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads `source=("https://downloads.vivaldi.com/stable/vivaldi-stable-${_rpmversion}.x86_64.rpm"`

anonfunc commented

2023-12-27 22:18:22 +01:00

Owner

True. I excluded vivaldi.

EDIT: We have another issue (#56) related to the same topic. It contains some arguments that may be worth reading.

True. I excluded `vivaldi`. EDIT: We have another issue (#56) related to the same topic. It contains some arguments that may be worth reading.

anonfunc added the

packaging issue

label 2023-12-27 22:19:22 +01:00

BS86 commented

2023-12-28 09:48:06 +01:00

Author

true, this here clearly is a duplicate

true, this here clearly is a duplicate

BS86 closed this issue

2023-12-28 09:48:06 +01:00

anonfunc added

and removed

packaging issue

labels 2023-12-29 19:51:08 +01:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label

blocked upstream

invalid/corrupt package

packaging issue

No Milestone

No project

No Assignees

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: ALHP/ALHP.GO#226

No description provided.